(800)525-7111 Free Consultation

Philips Recalls CPAP Machines and Ventilators Due to Potential Cancer Risk

Riddle Brantley LLP   |  June 14, 2021   |  

Philips has issued a recall of certain CPAP ventilators due to foam material that can degrade, potentially causing cancer. Breathing devices impacted include Philips Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (Bi-Level PAP), Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), and mechanical ventilator devices. The potential issue was first identified by the company in April 2021.

Philips CPAP Recall and Cancer Risk - Riddle & BrantleyAs many as 4 million Philips CPAP devices may be affected by the recall.

Our Philips CPAP lawsuit attorneys are actively investigating injury claims related to these devices and would love to help you however we can. Please call 1-800-525-7111 for a FREE, no-obligation consultation or complete the convenient form below.

WARNING: If you use a Philips BiLevel PAP or CPAP ventilator, the company has issued a RECALL and advises you to stop using the device immediately and consult a physician. Those using affected Philips mechanical ventilators are advised to consult with their doctor before discontinuing use of the device.  

Philips devices affected by the recall include:

  • Philips BiLevel PAP machines
  • Philips CPAP machines
  • Philips mechanical ventilators

Philips CPAP Cancer Risk

According to Philips, a foam component in certain BiLevel PAP and CPAP sleep apnea machines and ventilators may disintegrate. Disintegrated particles could then be inhaled by the user, potentially resulting in “toxic and carcinogenic effects.”

The foam particulates can be inhaled, irritating the airways, and gases released by the degrading foam could also be toxic or cause cancer.

Cancers potentially caused by defective CPAP machines include:

While no deaths have yet been reported, Philips said that the company has “received reports of possible patient impact due to foam degradation.”

Exposure to foam particulate / inhalation of chemical gases in Philips BiLevel PAP, CPAP, and mechanical ventilator devices may result in:

  • Headache
  • Nausea
  • Vomiting
  • Irritation
  • Inflammation
  • Respiratory issues (breathing problems)
  • Toxic effects
  • Cancer

Philips CPAP Cancer Risk - Riddle & BrantleyThe potentially cancer-causing particulate in Philips CPAP machines and ventilators comes from a type of foam that is used to dampen the machines’ sound.

According to Philips, roughly 80 percent of the machines affected by the recall are Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machines. Roughly two-thirds of the company’s CPAP device sales are in the United States.

The other affected devices are life-sustaining ventilators, most frequently used in hospitals.

Do You Have a Philips CPAP or Ventilator Cancer Claim?

Have you or a loved one suffered injury (including cancer) potentially due to a defective Philips BiLevel PAP or CPAP device, or mechanical ventilator? You may be entitled to compensation and our Philips CPAP lawsuit attorneys may be able to help.

For a FREE consultation with an experienced Philips CPAP lawsuit attorney, please call 1-800-525-7111 or complete the fast and easy form below.

The consultation is free, and we don’t get paid unless you do. If we don’t recover compensation for you in your Philips CPAP lawsuit, you won’t pay any attorney fees. It’s as simple as that.

Call 1-800-525-7111 and let’s review your claim.

“They handled my case very professionally, with respect from beginning to end.”

Joseph P, Riddle & Brantley client

Since 2000 alone, our defective medical device attorneys and injury lawyers have recovered more than $600 million in compensation for our deserving clients (see disclaimer below). We are ready to help however we can.

Justice Counts for those who have suffered cancer or other injury due to potentially defective medical devices like Philips CPAP machines and ventilators, and we would love to help you and your loved ones get the justice you deserve.

 


*** Disclaimer: The results mentioned are intended to illustrate the type of cases handled by the firm. These results do not guarantee a similar outcome, and they should not be construed to constitute a promise or guarantee of a particular result in any particular case. Every case is different, and the outcome of any case depends upon a variety of factors unique to that case.