It seems like every day that goes by, more and more lawsuits are mounting against Monsanto questioning Roundup’s cancer risk. Our blog has been following the Roundup cancer risk story for weeks.
A new report is shedding light on the role an advertising agency may have played in covering up Roundup’s cancer risk. Per the report, Monsanto has employed an agency in St. Louis to handle its advertising for over 20 years. The company’s ads, which have been banned in New York since the 1990s for being misleading, have claimed in the past that Roundup is “practically non-toxic” and less dangerous than table salt.
Did an Advertiser Help Cover Up Roundup’s Cancer Risk?
It seems like every day that goes by, more and more lawsuits are mounting against Monsanto questioning Roundup’s cancer risk. Our blog has been following the Roundup cancer risk story for weeks.
A new report is shedding light on the role an advertising agency may have played in covering up Roundup’s cancer risk. Per the report, Monsanto has employed an agency in St. Louis to handle its advertising for over 20 years. The company’s ads, which have been banned in New York since the 1990s for being misleading, have claimed in the past that Roundup is “practically non-toxic” and less dangerous than table salt.
It seems like every day that goes by, more and more lawsuits are mounting against Monsanto questioning Roundup’s cancer risk. Our blog has been following the Roundup cancer risk story for weeks.
A new report is shedding light on the role an advertising agency may have played in covering up Roundup’s cancer risk. Per the report, Monsanto has employed an agency in St. Louis to handle its advertising for over 20 years. The company’s ads, which have been banned in New York since the 1990s for being misleading, have claimed in the past that Roundup is “practically non-toxic” and less dangerous than table salt.